Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

CPO victory for Allies and Morrison's contentious Winchester plans

  • Comment

Developer Henderson Global Investors has been granted a compulsory purchase order for a huge chunk of Winchester paving the way for Allies and Morrison’s controversial Silver Hill development

The £135 million retail-led city centre scheme won planning permission back in 2007 for previous project backer Thornfield Ventures. Henderson took over the 55,000m² development after Thornfield’s demise in 2010 but kept the scheme on the shelf for more a year.

In September 2011 Henderson resurrected the project and began the Compulsory Purchase Order process prompting Robert Adam’s practice to come up with an alternative to Allies and Morrison’s ‘too massive [and] too anonymous’ proposals (see AJ 07.09.2011).

Following the decision by the Secretary of State, Henderson is looking to begin construction of the long-running proposal early next year (2014).

The scheme will cover almost a quarter of Winchester and is being billed as the largest single development in the historic city since the Brooks Centre was built in the 1980’s.

Martin Perry, development director at Henderson Property said: ‘Winchester is heavily under developed relative to its location and its dominant position in the South East retail hierarchy. To date, the City has experienced a lack of modern retail units that meet the needs of national and international retailers.We are confident that the provision of new space in the city, will significantly boost the retail offer further and help drive growth in the city, retaining expenditure rather than losing footfall to other nearby competing centres such as Southampton.’

Previous story (AJ 02.09.2011)

Allies and Morrison’s contentious Winchester plans resurrected

Developer Henderson Global Investors has kick-started Allies and Morrison’s controversial and long-running Silver Hill development in Winchester

The £135 million retail-led scheme won planning permission back in 2007 for previous project backer Thornfield Ventures. However, after Thornfield went into adminstration in early 2010, Henderson took over the 55,000m² city centre scheme but kept the scheme on the shelf until July this year to allow a ‘post-acquisition, conditional period’ to run out.

Now the developer has officialy re-started the scheme and intends to take the project, which covers almost a quarter of the historic cathedral city, through a potentially tricky Compulsory Purchase Order process (see AJ 16.04.2007).

According to Martin Perry, Henderson’s director of retail property development, this inquiry could take around 15 months. Perry confirmed the company intended to stick with the Allies and Morrison scheme - a redesign of an original proposal which was redrawn in 2006 following pressure from locals.

He said: ‘Obviously there may be a few changes, such as to the timber facade treatment, but in principle we intend to take the consented, detailed scheme through to construction.

‘We will also be looking at alterations to the retail units sizes and some of the phasing for the residential units. But we are not anticipating a wholesale redesign.

‘An application like this costs around £7-£8 million and we just can’t afford to respend that sort of money.’

He added: ‘It is a good scheme and Allies and Morrison has done a pretty good job. I’m impressed with what they’ve done.’

Perry admitted Henderson’s ‘favoured route’ was design and build and predicted Allies and morrison would be retained in an ‘executive monitoring role’ once the scheme moved toward construction, possibly as early as 2013.

The director of property also added that there was a likelihood of ‘spin-off work’ for other practices, in particular for the overhaul of other, neighbouring buildings once the development was taking shape.


  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more