Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Councils to set own planning fees


The government has revealed proposals to allow local authorities to charge what they want for handling planning applications

Research for the government carried out by Arup indicated that the current fixed planning fees caused councils to undercharge for their planning services.

As a result services had to be subsidised by council tax payers, the report claims.

Under new proposals which are currently out to consultation councils will determine their own fee levels but will be unable to charge more than the planning service’s actual cost or make a profit.

Greg Clark, decentralisation minister, said: ‘Letting councils set their own fees is a much fairer system for both the applicant and the local taxpayer and will ensure there is flexibility in the system to recover the actual costs of applications.’

The changes could come into effect from April 2011 with councils given six months from that date to publish their new fees.


Readers' comments (2)

  • So inefficient councils who are in a monopoly situation wasting quantities of Council Tax payers' money on futile and inappropriate opposition to development can pass those costs on to applicants. Does this pass any test of fairness? No.
    If Councils are able to set their own fees this should be on the basis of a cap linked to average actual costs around the country for dealing with specific types of application - cap say average +10%, with increasing penalties for councils who lose a disproportionate number of appeals.
    Any new system should be primarily geared to increased efficiency, fairness and reasonableness; there's precious little of any of these in my local authority.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • John Kellett

    When many Local Authorities do not have RTPI qualified case officers and even fewer have conservation officers with architectural or planning qualifications it should be difficult to justify.
    Every applicant should expect every submission to be dealt with by a fully qualified town-planner.
    Will architects, and their clients, be permitted to counter-charge for incompetence and time wasted on matters that are not town-planning matters?
    Will "agents" be vetted such that application submitted by RIBA / TRPI / CIAT / RICS / ARB professionals are 'fast-tracked' for a lower fee?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.