Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Council 'goes soft' on Goldfinger destroyer

  • Comment

Wandsworth Council has backtracked in its pursuit of a developer who illegally demolished part of a listed Erno Goldfinger-designed school

In December 2008, the London authority managed to secure a ground-breaking High Court order against Rajiv Laxman to start rebuilding the Grade-II Listed former caretaker’s cottage at Brandlehow School in Putney by March 1, 2009.

The full reconstruction had to be completed by the end of November last year (2009) or Laxman could have been found guilty of contempt and potentially risk a jail sentence, fines and the seizure of his company’s assets. The business man had already been fined twice for ignoring the Council’s calls to rebuild the cottage (Developer ordered to ‘rebuild’ razed Goldfinger building), which he flattened in 2007.

However, the Council appears not to have followed through on its promise saying it was instead in discussions with Laxman about a ‘revised scheme for this site, that would involve the reconstruction and reinstatement of the listed building’ and that talks were underway with English Heritage about whether the scheme was ‘viable’.

Meanwhile it is understood the building remains in rubble.

A disappointed spokesman for the Twentieth Century Society said: ‘Above anything else, we wish to see the rebuilding of the unlawfully demolished caretaker’s cottage at Brandlehow School.

‘The council has been robust in its actions so far and we very much hope that it remains committed to having the building put back. Laxman has consistently shown his blatant disregard for the planning system and the fines so far levied against him seem to have done little to motivate him, if he is not capable of organising the rebuilding of the cottage, he must surely now pay for someone else to do it.

‘If Wandsworth were to back down at this stage, it would send a clear message to developers that the only price to pay for the demolition of a listed building was £24,000 in fines.’

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.