Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Corb had to grapple with consequences of car

  • Comment
Letters

Tom Muirhead's assertion of the importance of the Futurist stance for Le Corbusier (AJ 1.3.01) must surely be right, but it ought to be possible by now to be more discriminating about his urbanism than simply to refer to it as 'disastrous'.

Muirhead attributes Futurism's influence to the 'big change' in Le Corbusier's urban thinking, from his youthful enthusiasm for Camillo Sitte and the 'traditional street' to the Ville Radieuse.

But this change was also influenced by the desire to accommodate the motor car, something which Sitte was barely conscious of, and did not play much part in Futurist urbanism either - the central railway station was the focus of Sant'Elia's attention.

By the early 1920s, however, the significance of the car had become apparent - at least to Le Corbusier, who sought to grapple with the consequences, which he believed included the obsolescence of the 'corridor (or traditional) street'.

Le Corbusier's urban ideas were an extension, as he himself stressed, of his architecture. The aspiration to 'light, space, and greenery' that permeated the design of his houses, also determined the shape of his cities. It is impossible to assess the one without the other.

James Dunnett, James Dunnett Architects, London N1

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.