Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Continuing campaign to revise PPG15

  • Comment

Last October Richard Rogers, Richard MacCormac and I met the planning minister, Richard Caborn mp, to discuss how planning guidance for the historic environment (ppg15) tends to militate against good replacement buildings in conservation areas and leads to the preservation of mediocre facades. We are undertaking a research programme to investigate how widespread this problem is.

We would be very interested to hear from architects or clients who have experienced instances, particularly outside London, where planners rejected sympathetic contemporary architecture in conservation areas, and retention of the facades of unlisted, old buildings, irrespective of their architectural quality, with new buildings concealed behind.

We would welcome any relevant material that could be included in the resarch as a case study. Information and transparencies showing the retained facades and the rejected scheme should be sent to Caroline King, the Richard Coleman Consultancy, Bridge House, 181 Queen Victoria Street, London EC4V 4DD, tel 0171 329 6622, fax 0171 329 6633, email: r.coleman@2000.co.uk

Richard Coleman

London EC4

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.