Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Comments are insult to all would-be reformers

  • Comment

The ARB's Robin Vaughan should remember that Ian Salisbury was recently elected to the ARB on a reformist ticket by a convincing number of those who bothered to vote, and an insult to him is an insult to all of us who support him.

Timothy Dutton QC may well have a particular view, formed partly on the questions he was asked. Another QC would have another view, but that is not the point.

It is up to the board as a whole as to whether it seeks to widen its remit, rather than maintain the minimalist organisation originally promised.

That's why we elected Ian Salisbury and other reformists.

The board and its registrar should read 'The Professionals' Choice' (see www. building futures. org. uk), against which to judge the appropriateness of expansionist and exclusivist policies over the next 20 years.

Colin James, Witney, Oxon

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.