Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Code leaves no roomfor complacency

  • Comment

I am astonished at the apparent complacency of the letters from Barbara Kelly and Andrew Finch (aj 15.1.98). Both seem to take 'Standard 11' out of its fullcontext.

Part of that rule makes it an offence to report a suspected breach and, elsewhere, not to take up any position whereby one might be in conflict with the requirements of the Code.

Having carefully read through the whole code in its last draft form (ie, substantially as it was approved by the Board), I found it internally inconsistent and largely ignorant of the processes of both design and building. That is consistent with the general public ignorance on those matters. I have made detailed comment on it to riba hq and Region, and await the answer to my question, 'Am I in breach of the code by the acceptance of an appointment as arbitrator in a building dispute where the contract has gone wrong (somehow) and another architect is involved', seeing that the essence of arbitration is privacy and confidentiality? I should like to know, as it will substantially affect my livelihood.


Registered architect and registered arbitrator

Carshalton, Surrey

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.