Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Coalition of critics slams the Garden Bridge

  • 8 Comments

Packed meeting in Waterloo hears from objectors ranging from architects and cycling campaigners to the Tax Payers’ Alliance

Leading architects joined with politicians, walking and cycling campaigners and gardeners in voicing their opposition to the Garden Bridge at a public meeting last night.

An audience of more than 200 people gathered at St John’s Church in Waterloo to hear the views of a wide spectrum of critics ranging from Labour politicians and Green Party leader Natalie Bennett to the Tax Payers’ Alliance.

Leading bridge designers Alistair Lenczner and Cezary Bednarski both delivered speeches while a letter from Ian Ritchie was read out which also argued strongly against the £175m Heatherwick Studio-designed scheme.

Lenczner, who was the in-house engineer on the world-famous Millau Viaduct while a partner at Foster & Partners and now works at Expedition Engineering, called the Garden Bridge a ‘private garden platform pretending to be a bridge’.

He said that good projects should begin with a need and then a brief followed by an open competition but said the Garden Bridge was different.

He said: ‘We seem to have ended up with a design which has had a need and a brief retrofitted onto it’, adding that good engineering should have made the scheme slimmer, cheaper and more efficient.

Bednarski, a leading bridge designer who has also judged several RIBA bridge competitions, questioned why Heatherwick Studio was selected for the 2013 competition run by Transport for London even though Heatherwick was not on any of its framework panels.

He added: ‘This student [Heatherwick] should go back to the drawing board because this project fails on every count.’

This project fails on every count

Chair of the London Cycling Campaign, Ann Kendrick, said the group was ‘extremely concerned’ by the lack of cycling provision on the Garden Bridge given its £60m of public funding.

She said: ‘It would be appalling for so much public money to be spent at this time on a new river crossing which excludes cyclists. This project does not seem to have been thought through. By 2030, we will have 10m people in London and there will have been a massive increase in the numbers of people on bikes.’

Natalie Bennett described the Garden Bridge as ‘greenwash’ and said £60m could be spent on creating larger areas of urban green space while Labour candidate for London Mayor Christian Wolmar said a ‘dishonest’ business case had been made for the scheme.

A Garden Bridge Trust spokesperson said: ‘The Garden Bridge is designed to offer pedestrians a new, very special, and free, route across the River Thames. It will provide a unique green corridor between two bustling areas of the capital, with thousands of new plants and trees providing real environmental benefits, as well as new views of a city and river that is always changing.

‘Independent bodies have conducted, and validated, extensive crowd modelling studies to ensure that numbers of pedestrians can be safely accommodated. We are determined that the Garden Bridge will show off the best of British engineering and innovation, with Olympic Cauldron designer Thomas Heatherwick in charge of design and award-winning landscape designer Dan Pearson the gardens.  

‘A robust business plan is in place to ensure the bridge is self-funded once completed, and can remain a special place for Londoners to use for generations to come.’

Other speakers  at the event included heritage campaigner Gavin Stamp, ‘Guerilla Gardener’ Richard Reynolds, president of the Metropolitan Public Gardens Association Hugh Johnson, chief executive of the Tax Payers’ Alliance Jonathan Isaby, head of the Waterloo Community Development Group Michael Ball, London Assembly Labour group leader Val Shawcross and Lib Dem leader Caroline Pidgeon. The meeting was organised by campaign group Thames Central Open Spaces, which is backing Michael Ball’s judicial review challenge to the Garden Bridge.

 

 

  • 8 Comments

Readers' comments (8)

  • I object to mt taxes and Council tax being spent on this project without any sort of mandate or public approval.

    I would be happy to see the money spent on maintaining the run down public parks in London and providing the funding that is needed to keep Kew Gardens going.

    Phil Hardie

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How can the estimated cost of £636,00 for each tree on this tourist attraction be "best value" for public money?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Here we go again.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • when will we see a digital illustration in WINTER

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ... and why, for that matter, are the most circulated external views always from a helicopter's point of view, and never from ground or river level? A question that answers itself.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Remember Covent Garden and the Motorway Box. We are now in an era of equivalent nonsensical projects. A robust business case? Like the one for HS2?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is Paul Finch wearing blinkers?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Industry Professional

    It's an old fashioned folly, pure and simple. This would be fine if like most historic follies it was privately funded. Remove the public funding and finance it through corporate altruism and it would be fine.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.