Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

City of London looks to increase affordable housing

  • 3 Comments

The City of London Corporation has said it wants to expand its affordable housing stock - potentially outside of its boundaries - as demand for homes in the capital continues to rise

Chair of the corporation’s policy and resource committee Mark Boleat said the housing problem had been ‘elephant in the room’ for too long and that the City must help boost the numbers of new homes.

Warning that ballooning housing costs were reducing the competitiveness of London ‘as a place to locate’ in the eyes of big business, Boleat said the City was now looking at several possible solutions, such as densifying existing estates, including those it owned in Hackney, Islington, Lambeth, Lewisham, Southwark and Tower Hamlets.

Speaking earlier today he said: ‘There is significant potential to build more housing units – infill – on existing housing estates, whilst also improving the amenity and quality of life for residents who already live there.

‘This applies to the City’s estates. We are not taking the lead on this. Imaginative schemes have already been implemented in other authorities. 

‘Our initial work already suggests that there is scope for a significant increase in housing units on our estates.’

Boleat said the city surveyor had been instructed to review whether the corporation owned land that ‘lends itself to housing development’.

In his address to the City’s full council on housing policy in London, Boleat also raised questions about the planning system and whether it ‘helped or hindered the delivery of new housing units’.

He asked: ‘Is it sufficient for example, for local authorities to aim simply to meet statutory social housing obligations, when acting as an “enabler” of more new housing units across the whole income spectrum is within our grasp?’

Meanwhile Westminster Council has published additional proposals to develop affordable housing outside its borders.

The authority’s deputy leader Robert Davis told the AJ’s sister title Construction News that the cost of providing affordable housing in the borough was ‘horrendous’, and said the council was looking at options to maximise its output.

His comments were backed up by a draft housing strategy released by Westminster Council last week, which set a target of delivering 1,250 affordable homes over the next five years.

The council said it was ‘constrained by the shortage and high cost of land’ in Westminster, so it was considering a ‘cost-effective use of [its] resources’ to develop housing outside the borough.

In the draft strategy, the council said: ‘No matter what we do, we will never provide enough homes in Westminster for everyone who wants to live here.

‘Even if we meet our target of delivering 250 homes a year, that is still 170 fewer than our housing-needs assessment suggests.

‘So we need to start thinking about whether some people’s needs can be better met by us helping them to access housing outside Westminster, or even by direct provision by the council of housing outside the city.’

  • 3 Comments

Readers' comments (3)

  • If the Corporation of London & Westminster ( and other Boroughs ) can’t afford to build in their own boroughs why not pool their resources with the GLA and take on one of the many brownfield sites that the GLA owns and build housing there . The Olympic park seems an obvious spot, cleared sites with approval for thousands of homes yet instead it is being drip fed to private developers who drip feed phases to people who clamor to buy at ever higher prices.

    Seems a complete no brainier. The GLA has ample land to build on and Councils are looking for places to build.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Chris Rogers

    Your 1st pic is from about 2010 and includes CGIs of bldgs not yet built or likely to ever be. Odd. Why not show a pic of the Middx street estate??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How can a council not afford to build on it's own land? It's land they own isn't it? Or do they mean they don't want to build low cost housing on land that could bring in huge revenues if sold to the private sector? If that's the case then priorities need to be readdressed because somebody has to make a stand about the current rate of private development that doesn't provide for ordinary Londoners and in fact exacerbates the housing crisis. Everyone is talking about it but nothing practical is being put into place.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.