Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment

The riba must address the issue of intellectual property rights (IPR), argued Jonathan Ball in discussing Tim Gough's paper on risk in architecture. Ball said that a day-one IPR declaration would be the best way to protect the most valuable part of an architect's contribution - the creative thinking at the beginning of a project. 'Society sees us as a soft touch,' he said. John Wright said that the way housing associations expected architects to work at risk was 'outrageous'. Jim Cuthbertson went further. 'If I work to stage C for nothing for a housing association,' he said, 'I am bribing them to get the fee.' The level of work architects are expected to do for nothing is ridiculous, said Marco Goldschmied. For instance, on the competition for the Inland Revenue building at Nottingham, Richard Rogers Partnership was head to head with Michael Hopkins, the eventual winner, 'they asked for so much detail from both practices that we both ended up drawing 1:20-scale typical elevations'.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs