Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

CABE: be clearer on the outline - and the detail

  • Comment
letters

Your report (AJ 19.9.02) on CABE's views of the Hungate masterplan proposals in York (above) quotes author John Thompson as saying that CABE had misunderstood the intentions of the scheme, which is at outline stage. I don't think we did misunderstand them.

We review many projects at the outline stage and welcome the opportunity to do so - this is when the most important decisions are being made - and we do understand the difference between outline and detailed design. We have criticised some projects for trying to pin down too much at outline stage as well as others for showing too little.

What really matters is being clear about what you are trying to pin down and what you are leaving open - and why. If a scheme is being promoted with seductive visual imagery, what relation does this bear to what is actually intended, or defined? A particular difficulty with outline applications, in our experience, is that by agreeing the principles of development at this stage, a local authority is in a weaker position when it comes to negotiate the detail later.

Peter Stewart, director, Design Review, CABE

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

ARCHITECTURE JOBS BY EMAIL

Do you want the latest jobs emailed to you?
Sign up for job alerts.

AJ Jobs