Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

BSF ‘made the schools estate worse’


The bulk of England’s secondary schools estate is in a worse condition than it would have been had Building Schools for the Future never happened, the head of the Department for Education’s Central Capital Unit told a conference

Speaking at the UK Schools Buildings Procurement Summit in London last Thursday (27 November), Peter Livesey also defended the government’s use of PFI to deliver its £2.69 billion Priority Schools Building Programme, reported sister title Construction News.

He said: ‘Because BSF was always intended to rebuild every school, I think that conditions improvements weren’t being made because the schools were waiting.’

The result has been a degradation of the schools estate to the point where ‘patching up bad schools is simply not good value for money.’

Livesey promised that delivering the proposed 100 schools through PFI would be the most timely and cost effective method.

‘The amount of public money is constrained,’ he said. ‘Yes, we are cognizant that PFI has been criticised by the Treasury Select Committee and others. But we have learned lessons from the past.’

The ‘massively over-subscribed’ application process for PSBP was closed on October 14, and Livesey pledged to start procurement for the first batch in the second quarter of 2012. The work would be completed by the start of the school year in 2013, he said.

‘In order to ensure we meet our tight deadlines, the procurement process will be highly centralised, in line with proposals in the James Review.’


Readers' comments (2)

  • So really the situation is only worse because the scheme was scrapped and our coalition government stopped investing in our schools...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • John Kellett

    "start procurement for the first batch in the second quarter of 2012. The work would be completed by the start of the school year in 2013"!

    Does that mean just over a year to fully design and construct a complete new school? Sounds a bit optimistic, especially for PFI.

    If true one would have to question the 6 month delay in starting. A 50% increase in programme would make the task merely 'improbable' rather than 'not very possible at all'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.