Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

BSF cuts: Ministers 'warned about school list errors'

  • Comment

Ministers ignored officials’ advice not to publish an error-strewn list of scrapped school building projects before it could be double-checked, a quango boss has said

The Department for Education was told that the list needed to be seen by local authorities before it could be released to the public, according to Tim Byles, chief executive of Partnerships for Schools (PfS).

PfS oversaw the £55 billion Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme, which was axed by Education Secretary Michael Gove earlier this month amid much controversy. The quango itself faces the chop according to reports earlier this month.

Byles told the Commons education select committee that there had been ‘a number of misunderstandings circulating around the handling of the Secretary of State’s recent announcement on BSF’.

More than 700 secondary schools which had not yet reached financial close on their building works saw their projects cancelled as a result of Gove’s decision, and he came under fire over his handling of the situation after it emerged that initial lists of affected works were strewn with errors.

It was suggested by some at the time that responsibility for the errors lay with PfS.

Byles told the cross-party group of MPs:’When we were asked to provide detailed lists of all schools, both those in procurement and those in pre-procurement, we advised the Department that it would be wise to validate this information with each local authority, prior to publication, due to the inherent risk of errors.

‘This advice was not followed and a number of errors arose.’

Byles told the committee this advice had been given because PfS is required to hold data only on schools that have reached the procurement phase of works. While they also have data on schools that local authorities would like to enter the BSF programme, this information is ‘fairly fluid’.

However Byles admitted that an error which saw several schools in Sandwell, West Midlands listed as continuing, only later to be informed they had been scrapped, was PfS’s fault.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.