Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Brits in line for Baghdad bonanza

  • 1 Comment

Teams led by Broadway Malyan and Woods Bagot have been named on a seven strong shortlist to design $30 billion of new housing in Baghdad

According to reports, Saber al-Issawi, the Mayor of the Iraqi capital, has received firm bids from seven foreign consortia vying to build 150,000 flats, shops, parks and cinemas over 10 years in a war-shattered suburb in the north east of the city.

The Iraqi government has agreed to pump $10 billion of its own money into the project over the next decade to revamp Sadr City (aerial photograph above), a largely Shia area of Baghdad and branded ‘one of the most striking examples of the unchecked growth of Baghdad’s population’.

Vast chunks of the area were razed by US airstrikes and, according to Reuters, ‘the area’s poorest live in shelters cobbled together from scavenged materials.’

The Baghdad municipality reportedly prequalified seven companies out of an initial 27 expressions of interest – teams which included project managers Halcrow Group, structural engineers Buro Happold and consultants Pell Frischmann.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Daniel Hewitt

    It conveys a deep disregard for the suffering of the people of Baghdad to describe the awarding of reconstruction contracts to Western firms as a 'bonanza'. It would appear to betray what Naomi Klein identifies in her book 'The Shock Doctrine' as the motives for the Iraq war: namely, state-backed corporate imperialism. If Western firms are to be involved (which it seems inevitable that they will), I suggest being a bit more modest and perhaps emphasise the nature of the responsibility involved.

    The AJ's role balances between independent journalism and promoting the interests of the profession. I'd prefer more of the former, but in any event please don't let your coverage topple over into inhuman corporate sycophancy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.