Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Birmingham Foyer looks like a prison

  • Comment
letters

Believing as I do that there is nothing so practical as a good theory, I make no apologies for basing my evaluation of a building on published theories of what makes good architecture, rather than on personal opinion, so I suppose I shall continue to mystify Martin Stockley (Letters, aj 30.7.98).

My definition of an 'active building front' is taken from Responsive Environments, and the Birmingham Foyer does not fulfil any of its criteria. Yes, the ground floor is full of active uses, but they have no engagement with street. They are invisible. The building has no 'transparency' as defined by Kevin Lynch in Managing the Sense of a Region; the ability of a person in the street to understand, by sensory means, what the building is for and what is happening inside it.

I think Mr Stockley misunderstands what I mean by 'social programme'. Put simply, I mean that a building should communicate its purpose and its values to the outer world. I believe this is an uncontentious and widely accepted precept of architecture. My window cleaner subscribes to this theory, and he says the Foyer looks like a prison. He is not the only one who says this.

JOE HOLYOAK

Birmingham

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.