Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Attack! Attack!

  • Comment
astragal

Rowan was on vitriolic form in his own column last week, lambasting the unfortunate fact that having won planning permissions using big name architects, sites are sold on and the architects change. He was particularly concerned that Norman Foster's designs for liffe in Spitalfields, not very good in the first place, were now being substituted by what he terms'a practice called EPR'. From this you might imagine that they were a new example of Britarch, or some obscure firm that had done little in London. In fact, Elsom Pack & Roberts, as it used to be known, is a major practice which has done good work, as well as some forgettable stuff, in London for decades. Rowan attacks the firm's Hammersmith Broadway Post-Modern scheme, but the truth is that epr was asked to design two different schemes, one Po-Mo, one Modernist. In the end the client chose the former. The architects deserve more of a break.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.