Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment

Architects and Planners for Justice in Palestine (APJP) alleges oppression of Palestinians by Israeli architects and planners (AJ 09.02.06). I am aware of several projects designed specifically for joint ventures between Israelis and Palestinians, particularly for youth use and cultural purposes. Obviously APJP has not heard this side of the story.

The AJ is mistaken in labelling Stephen Rose's academic boycott of Israel successful. Although certain British academics voted for it at a 'debate' with no opposition allowed, it was soon overturned as the forces of reason prevailed. Professor Colin Blakemore and others of equal distinction refused to join. Richard Dawkins issued a public statement regretting that he had signed up to this boycott after being subjected to great pressure. He recognised that Israeli academics are mainly very liberal and work for peace. Dialogue with them can only be constructive.

The interests of the Palestinians would be best served by fostering and nurturing hope. Do architects really believe that injustice for the Jewish state will mean justice for the Palestinians?

I think not. This enterprise gives no credit to the profession.

Rebecca Goldsmith, London

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs