Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment

Expat Peter Arnold (Letters, 01.03.07) seems to share, with ex-ARB chairman Humphrey Lloyd, an ignorance of the rule in Vaughn v Taff Valley Railway (1860) which constrains statutory bodies to do only what statute expressly empowers them to do. The ARB has no lawful right to authorise registered architects to use a logo - even with the restriction that it must not be used as an affix.

The ARB cannot police use of the initials ARB by unregistered persons because they can mean anything and are in extensive use in the UK. For instance, in the Health and Safety Executive's ARB News, the initials refer to arborists and aboriculturists. Furthermore, the ARB has no jurisdiction outside the UK. The initials 'ARB' are used by numerous foreign companies in their registered names and by at least two European Institutes (Académie Royale de Belgique and Asocia¸ia Româna a Bancilor). In contrast, the affix RIBA is authorised by charter for use by chartered architects worldwide, and is protected in the UK by trademark registration.

I warn Mr Arnold not to use the affix 'ARB' in the litigious USA. He could find himself part of an expensive lawsuit.

Maurice McCarthy, Chorleywood, Hertfordshire

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.