Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

'Ambiguous' Bishopsgate ruling supports demolition

  • Comment

The latest chapter in the legal battle over the future of London's historic Bishopsgate Goods Yard viaduct has ended, with both London Underground (LUL) and the London Railway Heritage Society (LRHS) claiming victory.

Both sides believe that the ruling, which sent LUL away with a flea in its ear for breaking planning regulations but said that the scheme is no longer a case for the judiciary, represents victory for their argument.

However, indications are that the ruling will eventually benefit LUL and those who want to see the viaduct's demolition under way as soon as possible. But the LRHS has asserted that it will not give up the fight, claiming there are still a number of legal avenues open to campaigners.

High Court judge Mr Justice Ouseley upheld the Railway Heritage Society's claim that LUL had broken planning regulations on public consultation, but said he did not support the argument that the scheme should therefore be shelved. Ouseley instructed LUL to renegotiate planning consent with the two local authorities responsible for the site, Hackney and Tower Hamlets. And Ouseley told the court that it is 'no longer a case for the judiciary'.

This will come as a disappointment to those who want to see the area saved from demolition as both local councils have a long-standing history of backing the tube extension for regeneration reasons.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs