Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Affix question couldaffect all architects

  • Comment

Maurice McCarthy deserves the support of Council and members of all designations, whether the current issue of the professional affix affects them now or not (aj 15.1.98). None of us knows what future vicissitudes may affect our working activities - through which we are able to maintain flexible riba membership and the use of the appropriate affix. To do so out of practice is as essential as it is when in practice.

There are a host of intermediate and associated stages of 'practising or carrying on business' within the profession which will be denied their right to declare their membership if the arb persists in its adoption of narrow and seemingly vindictive interpretations of professional activity.

The arb Code casts a wide net in that 'disciplinary proceedings may be brought in respect of the professional conduct or competence of an architect, whether or not practising or carrying on business under any name, style or title containing the word 'architect'' (Introduction: d) - though 'writing or lecturing' are exempt from some Standards.

Why doesn't the arb leave it at that and allow (!) members to use their affix whether or not always 'practising or carrying on business' as an architect - whatever that may from time to time mean to each of us?


datum international

Marshfield, Wilts

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs