Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

A regrettable dearth of serious comment

  • Comment

I wonder if your report on Harry Seidler's comments on the poor construction of the World Trade Center (AJ 27.9.01) was a hotter news item than was implied by its being tucked away in Astragal? I am sure the national media would be interested in it.

The architectural aspects of the New York disaster have also hardly been touched on. It may be that style took precedent over people's safety - the exposedsteel structural mullions giving the buildings that 'elegant, minimalist' Miesian look, so fashionable in the 1970s, with the New York Port Authority colluding in the cutting of regulation corners.

How much were the terrorists aware of these architectural factors, bearing in mind that bin Laden made his money in building and Mohamed Atta was at one time 'an architectural student'? And what would the outside world make of the fact that the leading architectural journal received no serious correspondence on the matter?

Louis Hellman, London W3

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.