Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

A fifth of all social housing schemes ‘poor’

  • 1 Comment

A survey by the Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) has branded a fifth of all social housing schemes ‘poor’ and lacking distinctiveness

Difficulty in navigating around the area and limited access to local amenities were other charges levelled at current housing schemes. The findings also show nearly two thirds (61 per cent) to be considered ‘average’ with just 18 per cent considered ‘good’ or ‘very good’.

As a result of these findings, CABE has teamed up with the HCA in a bid to improve design quality of new homes.

In a joint statement, Richard Simmons, chief executive of CABE and Sir Bob Kerslake, chief executive of the HCA, said: ‘We all want public housing to blaze the trail for good quality, sustainable design. This survey shows that too much social housing has not been good enough in recent years. High standards are crucial to improving quality.’

The survey did find some aspects of housing schemes were strong, including architectural quality and the tenure and accommodation mix. Many schemes also outperformed statutory minimum criteria, such as building regulations.

The report recommends closer work between registered social landlords (RSLs) and local planning authorities plus the enforcement of minimum design standards, including Building For Life. A design and sustainability advisory group is currently being set up by the HCA to provide independent strategic policy advice to the agency.

The survey was commissioned by the Housing Corporation, which together with English Partnerships became part of the HCA in December 2008.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Well let's hope everybody doesn't think that architects are responsible for the majority of these 'noddy boxes' - cheap construction, bad planning and the plethora of 'Changing Rooms' type programmes are responsible for enforcing poor design on all of us.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.