Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

. . . as Farrell formally calls for an Urban Design Council . . .

  • Comment

The built environment is now the only area where people have low expectations of design, said Terry Farrell at last week's Urban Design conference. He formally launched his proposal for an Urban Design Council, along the lines of the Design Council. Farrell lauded the work of the council - achieved with a grant of £7 million a year and 38 executive staff - but did not explain where he hoped this sort of money would come from for the UDC.

The importance of money was also a key note of other speakers' presentations. John Rouse, secretary of the Urban Task Force, stressed the importance of convincing not only the DETR and DCMS of the importance of urban design, but also the Treasury. 'Design costs money but creates value, ' he said. 'If we want a good fiscal set-up that encourages good design, we have to convince the Treasury on its own terms.'

He warned: 'If we don't get this part of our work right - a sensible arrangement built up by cogent reason - we will be compromised.' Without Treasury backing, he said, too many projects could end up like Bristol's proposed Harbourside Centre, 'an archive of unbuilt schemes'.

Also concerned about money is Kevin Murray, a director of EDAW and also chair of the Urban Design Alliance's housing committee. 'Getting an urban design element in to a project does cost, ' he said, and asked: 'Who pays for that?' The problem, he said, is that the benefits are not felt rapidly enough for the housebuilders to benefit. Instead, the benefits go to 'the second, third and fourth generation of owners'.

Time was also a worry to Rouse. Of his Ruskinian 'seven clamps of urban design' (see editorial, page 25), his seventh was 'The clamp of short-termism'. He said that most spending programmes are dominated by 'five-year funding programmes, the four-year political cycle, and the spectre of annuality'. Good urban design cannot, he said, be realised within such a short timescale.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.