Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Dan Usiskin

Recent activity

Comments (9)

  • Comment on: Carmody Groarke wins contest to extend Ghent’s Design Museum

    Dan Usiskin's comment 24 October, 2019 4:36 pm

    Don't be so miserable! They have even put a cornice on the elevation to tie the buildings together - a planner's default that works very well on this occasion. Your comment about scale is what one would expect from a greenhorn planner, even though the form of the new design seems from the illustrations to be both imaginative and appropriate

  • Comment on: KPF’s designs for London's tallest resi tower ‘a concern’, says mayor

    Dan Usiskin's comment 19 October, 2019 11:14 pm

    That's the scariest thing I've seen for quite a while. Perhaps some imaginative PR is required from the developer - how about The Dreaming Spires of Ealing.......

  • Comment on: Twickenham Riverside contest designs revealed

    Dan Usiskin's comment 16 September, 2019 10:18 pm

    It's difficult to judge six schemes for the same site with only perspectives to go on, and with no background on the differences in briefs between the schemes. But, on the evidence presented, Francis Terry's scheme wipes the floor with the current five proposals, none of which demonstrate anything like Terry's understanding of how to address the river, use appropriate scale when viewed from the river or its banks, create coherent form, proportion, massing and above all a real sense of place-making.
    The current five range from feeble but inoffensive to downright horrendous.
    I,m not suggesting that Terry has the only answer - in the last couple of decades there has been a growing awareness among some modern architects of the lessons of history (eg Ancient Greece and Rome, Italian hill towns), in particular relating to place-making and the civic realm.
    The current five schemes completely fail to address the huge potential of this exceptional site. None of them are anywhere near good enough, and the promoters need to start again

  • Comment on: Mayor rejects ‘unwelcoming, poorly designed’ Tulip

    Dan Usiskin's comment 16 July, 2019 9:32 am

    It's not a Tulip
    It's a Q-Tip

    It's also off the scale that starts with ugly and ends with hideous.

    Its single virtue would be to pull the eye away for a second or two from the surrounding cluster of monstrosities which together so eloquently express the triumphant chaos of international speculative finance, and the murder of the civic realm....

  • Comment on: Purcell to refurbish Grade II-listed masterwork by John Partridge

    Dan Usiskin's comment 22 June, 2019 9:56 am

    I'm confused. The text talks about 'light touch', preserving the existing (iconic) design and so on. Completely appropriate for such an important building.
    The visuals show everything existing covered up in grey render, wood laminate suspended ceiling panels of the wrong shape - the whole looking like the departure lounge to Hell.
    We are being seriously misled one way or the other.

View all comments