Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Corb your enthusiasm

  • Comment

Fans who celebrated Le Corbusier’s birthday on Thursday last week (6 October) may be saddened to learn old Corb came in for a bashing the very same day as part of a London School of Economics debate on architecture and happiness

Philosopher Roger Scruton, who debated against Centre for London director Ben Rogers, described Le Corbusier’s architecture as a ‘menace’, saying his vision of Chandigarh had ‘never been a home to anyone’ and was ‘a machine for dying in’.

But the worst insult he reserved for Reading. ‘Nowhere in human history has so much ugliness accumulated in so small a place.’ Equally bleak was Rogers’ argument. ‘Think about the object of architecture – a beautiful building. Will that actually contribute to the sum of human happiness? Grow up, of course it won’t.’

le Corbusier's Chandigarh

le Corbusier’s Chandigarh

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.