Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Chris Medland

One-world design


Architect Director, One-world design:

Recent activity

Comments (257)

  • Comment on: Gensler reveals masterplan for 4,000 homes on Portsmouth 'super-peninsula'

    Chris Medland's comment 21 September, 2019 8:26 am

    Portsmouth, and the whole of Portsea Island, faces a huge challenge with sea level rise. Is building even more here sensible or is it just that the land here is cheap in comparison to building on the mainland and up the hill?

  • Comment on: Ministers propose sprinklers for all housing over six storeys

    Chris Medland's comment 6 September, 2019 11:13 am

    good, and use pressure brought to building owners by insurance premiums to encourage installation of fire suppression systems to existing buildings over 6 storeys.

  • Comment on: Sturgeon: all new public buildings in Scotland to be zero carbon

    Chris Medland's comment 5 September, 2019 3:51 pm


  • Comment on: TfL paid firms almost £10 million for canned Rotherhithe crossing

    Chris Medland's comment 3 September, 2019 8:49 am

    £52m of public transport money spent on the Garden Bridge & Rotherhithe bridges without any public transport benefit gained. £52m is enough to have built the Cremorne (Diamond Jubilee Bridge) back in 2012 twice over. Assuming a 12 month construction period, by now, as forecast by TfL's own modelling in their report to the Mayor, over 7 million journeys would have been taken off the roads around Battersea and Fulham bringing huge air quality, health, time saving and environmental benefits to London as a whole. The funding gap now stands at £14m which we are working with Wandsworth Council to fill. Watching the other projects come and go and all that money being spent has been an education. There must be a better way of securing value for money in the prioritisation, procurement method and delivery of Bridges and wider infrastructure. Need and cost are mathematically provable, the cost:benefit ratio is a provable and measurable result that can be used in comparisons. Politicians from both main parties are guilty to a certain extent of playing to their crowds as you would expect, but this leads to dead ends, waste and the delivery of (in the past decade) nothing. There must be a way, lead by engineers and modelling, that takes the politics out of these decisions and enables infrastructure money to be spent in the best way to serve the end purpose - to reduce climate change, improve air quality, increase housing density and economic activity, improve health and quality of life.

  • Comment on: KCA’s troubled Hackney block to be evacuated over fire safety fears

    Chris Medland's comment 2 September, 2019 5:51 pm

    agree with above comments - if a practice is not responsible for the detail design then it is not their block and the headline is misleading. House builders seem pleased to badge their developments with the kudos that the name of a good architects firm brings but not as pleased to employ them to see the project through - can the AJ dig a little deeper here?

View all comments

Job of the week

AJ Jobs