Alan Dunlop's comments
Maybe Whitehaven is a tad megalomaniacal Michael, how about Workington or Flimby?
"PFI does not seems to be a good way to go about things" Who knew, eh? Apparently it's toxic.
PPP schools ‘little more than a roof’
From The Herald - Thursday 08th December 2005 )
A stark warning over the quality of new schools in Scotland built with the help of private money will be delivered today at a design conference. Alan Dunlop, a Glasgow-based architect, will tell the Children in Scotland conference in Edinburgh that PPP process is "failing" children.
"We are building schools for children that we wouldn't use as adults. The architects involved in the PPP process have no time for development because fees are cut to the bone so any idea of developing design is a non-starter," he said.
Herald 2005 Several arguements against PPP
Other stuff, too many too list
I know Barmulloch well, it's an area of Glasgow that has experienced deprivation but has retained a strong community spirit. This is an excellent example of community participation and resolve and the commitment of the architects over a number of years to produce something remarkable. This is a true "masterpiece of regeneration". Congratulations to Collective Architecture and the Barmulloch Community Development Company
What are the "legal impediments"?
This is all very worrying, with echoes of RIBA on governance and finances 2010 to 2016, right enough Owen Luder
Published in the Herald 11th November
"Schism in Scottish architecture as 100 architects accuse RIAS of secrecy and "insufficient financial accountability"
MORE than 150 of Scotland’s leading architects have launched an unprecedented attack on their professional body, accusing it of being financially inept and a “secretive and autocratic” organisation.
The group, calling itself A New Chapter, delivered the damning assessment of the 100-year-old Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland (RIAS) in an open letter.
In it the architects, who includes luminaries such as Malcolm Fraser and Jude Barber said: “We are concerned at what we see as a lack of effectiveness, poor governance and insufficient financial accountability in Scottish architecture’s professional body."
Published this morning.
True and the right client. Instead, The Lighthouse, the conversion of Mackintosh's Glasgow Herald building was the flagship project for 1999, the granaries demolished and Glasgow Harbour 1 created.
A remarkable and strangely compelling project.
In 1997, in the run up to 1999 Glasgow's year of architecture and design, we, a few members of the Glasgow Institute of Architects, looked at turning the Meadowside Granaries, at the time the largest brick built structure in Europe, into an arts complex but the engineering and construction challenges seemed too great and the cost for Glasgow too high to convert the silos. We should have stuck at it.
This was published today by Project Scotland
a construction publication that does not have the prestige of aj but probably read more by contractors, developers and local authorities.
"ONE of Scotland’s most experienced quantity surveyors has lamented the way in which the construction industry has allowed itself to become “cost and fee driven”.
Aberdeen-based Michael C Hastie, who has headed up his own practice for 40 years, believes the way projects are procured has led to architects, quantity surveyors and civil engineers “scrabbling for fees”, resulting in a poorer service.
Mr Hastie made his remarks in response to comments by architect Alan Dunlop in the wake of the Grenfell Tower tragedy in the previous issue of Project Scotland.
Mr Dunlop called for a return to more traditional building contracts following the fatal fire and said the role of the architect in a design team had been “marginalised”.
Mr Hastie said the tendering of fees is a “recipe for disaster” that has “driven the professions involved to the brink over the past 20 years”.
He told Project Scotland, “Everybody trims everything to the bone in order to achieve the contract, and in trimming it to the bone you have to affect the level of service you give.
“The dilution of the service results in errors, mistakes and the product not being suitable.
“In order to get the job you have to be competitive; now, competitive doesn’t mean competitive in quality, it means competitive in price and that is where the customer always lets himself down.
“He looks at the bottom line, he doesn’t take into account, I believe, the true cost of cutting the fee, which is that the service will go down.”
Mr Hastie continued, “The architect ends up working for the contractor, not the client, so the architect will specify what the contractor can afford to put on the job, to reflect the price for the overall contract, not what the client wants to see, and that’s where it all falls down.
“In the old team, the architect was the specifying officer and the supervising officer and his word was law."