Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

What industry figures want: Hywel Davies

  • Comment

Hywel Davies, technical director, Chartered Institute of Building Services Engineers

Our big concern is compliance. Building Control inspectors are necessarily occupied with identifying potential risks to public health and safety issues.

In response to the first question on compliance, we expressed concern for Part L, particularly how thoroughly the calculation for CO2 emissions is checked. I understand that a certificate system is under discussion stating that the calculation reflects what was actually built rather than what was ‘designed’ to be built. This introduces liability into the equation, which causes concern. But if the calculation is done properly there will be no problem, no regulatory cost and no administrative burden. We are not arguing for self-certification. Part L is complicated and designers are best placed to handle it. Building Control could then focus on clients who don’t employ experienced professionals, therefore presenting a greater risk of uncompliance.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.