By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.

Close

Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

What industry figures want: Hywel Davies

Hywel Davies, technical director, Chartered Institute of Building Services Engineers

Our big concern is compliance. Building Control inspectors are necessarily occupied with identifying potential risks to public health and safety issues.

In response to the first question on compliance, we expressed concern for Part L, particularly how thoroughly the calculation for CO2 emissions is checked. I understand that a certificate system is under discussion stating that the calculation reflects what was actually built rather than what was ‘designed’ to be built. This introduces liability into the equation, which causes concern. But if the calculation is done properly there will be no problem, no regulatory cost and no administrative burden. We are not arguing for self-certification. Part L is complicated and designers are best placed to handle it. Building Control could then focus on clients who don’t employ experienced professionals, therefore presenting a greater risk of uncompliance.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters