By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


What industry figures want: Andy Jobling

Andy Jobling, technical manager, Levitt Bernstein

This consultation has correctly identified the difficulties faced by the building industry when Building Regulations are amended piecemeal. This often introduces conflicts between different parts of the regulations which are not updated synchronously.

The current proposal is to update the regulations on a three-year cycle. We welcome this, but would prefer a longer interval. If you consider that even a modest-sized project lasts three years, then architects would start every new project designing to a new set of Building Regulations.

There is growing opinion that Construction (Design Management) Regulations sit uncomfortably on their own and the Health and Safety Executive does not have the resources to enforce them. They could become another section of the Building Regulations – which, after all, arose entirely to control public health and safety in the built environment.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters