By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


How should Part 3 change? Pamela Cole

Pamela Cole, Part 3 course leader, University of Protmouth and chairwoman of APSAA

We cannot reduce standards, no matter what the state of the economy, but the way of achieving standards can be more flexible and course deliverers are engaging with this. For example, some institutions are looking at the possibility of a fast and slow-track approach by spreading the course over two years, so some modules and learning can be done while students are out of work. This is a good initiative, because it enhances students’ career prospects and they remain engaged with the profession.

Part 3 has the opportunity to evolve after being static for some time. The impact of the recession is certainly an impetus, but so is our engagement with the EU and, not least, the nature of projects undertaken. Part 3 still has one foot in the 20th century and now needs to respond to changing times. We need a new perspective on training that is inclusive for all types of architect. Without this the profession will become an increasingly smaller cog in the bigger construction wheel.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters