Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

How should Part 3 change? Dominic Wilkinson

  • Comment

Dominic Wilkinson, chairman of education RIBA North West and senior architect, Austin-Smith: Lord

More from: RIBA Part 3 debate

On my first day at architecture school the head of department blithely informed the year that 10 per cent of us would qualify within the prescribed seven years. The reality, which is still the case, is that the majority simply take longer to complete their practical experience.

Current graduates face two principal issues: a lack of active site-stage projects on which to gain appropriate experience for those in work and a lack of any architectural work at all for the rest. The former can be mitigated by mentoring, partnering or simply taking longer. The RIBA can, and should, actively help in this process by taking a relaxed view on blocks of experience gained across several projects.

The latter is a far more difficult problem. Absence of employment will see an increasing number of Part 2 graduates stacking up and some will inevitably become disillusioned and leave the profession. Practices cannot conjure up work and altering the basis of Part 3 examinations will make no material change to this situation.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.