By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


How should Part 3 change? Dominic Wilkinson

Dominic Wilkinson, chairman of education RIBA North West and senior architect, Austin-Smith: Lord

On my first day at architecture school the head of department blithely informed the year that 10 per cent of us would qualify within the prescribed seven years. The reality, which is still the case, is that the majority simply take longer to complete their practical experience.

Current graduates face two principal issues: a lack of active site-stage projects on which to gain appropriate experience for those in work and a lack of any architectural work at all for the rest. The former can be mitigated by mentoring, partnering or simply taking longer. The RIBA can, and should, actively help in this process by taking a relaxed view on blocks of experience gained across several projects.

The latter is a far more difficult problem. Absence of employment will see an increasing number of Part 2 graduates stacking up and some will inevitably become disillusioned and leave the profession. Practices cannot conjure up work and altering the basis of Part 3 examinations will make no material change to this situation.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters