By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


How should Part 3 change? Alastair Robertson

Alastair Robertson, Part 3 professional studies advisor, Architectural Association and examinations consultant

Professional registration is a good thing but architecture is now one of the only undifferentiated professions, with a ‘one size fits all’ approach.

I suggest that ARB and the RIBA introduce a membership structure based on the three main strata of professional practice – project initiation, project development and project administration – and admitted people to membership once they had satisfied examination requirements in at least one of these. Not only would graduates be able to enter the profession at a much earlier stage and age, be able to specialise in one particular field if they wished, but also ARB and RIBA would not miss out on the three or four years of membership fees lost while students scramble to get all the pieces of the present competency jigsaw together.

It allows the client either to choose a ‘general practitioner’ qualified in all areas, or a specialist who focuses on a particular aspect of delivery.

Readers' comments (1)

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters