By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


The Thames plan cannot be botched

A masterplan for the Thames Gateway is essential, but it must be considered and decisive, says Hilary Reid Evans

Thinking of the Thames Gateway reminds me that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. While that is one piece of infrastructure that nobody wants, it seems to be making extraordinary progress. After years of effort and dozens of attempts at regeneration, we are left with a region synonymous with failure. It is easy to list the issues: the horrendously complex existing delivery mechanism; the out-of-date targets; the lack of co-ordination; and the all too prevalent silo mentality.

There is huge expectation regarding what the new Homes and Communities Agency (HCA), launched on Monday (1 December), can deliver and the planned review of delivery bodies is a fantastic start. But how can anyone know what sort of delivery body will be effective if they don’t know what they are trying to achieve? I always thought structure followed strategy.

The strategy for the Gateway includes the promise of creating an eco-region. Great, but I wonder how this will be implemented and how long it will take. The eco-towns debacle has inevitably debased the currency of what should be the keystone of a truly economically, environmentally and ecologically sustainable plan for the area.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related images

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters