Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Sue Lindsey's stories

Sort By: Newest firstOldest firstA-ZZ-A

  • INKY BUSINESSSubscription

    Archive10 May, 2007

    LEGAL

  • BALLS IN COURTSubscription

    Archive3 May, 2007

    LEGAL

  • LIGHTING UPSubscription

    Archive19 April, 2007

    LEGAL

  • WATERY ENDSubscription

    Archive22 February, 2007

    LEGAL

  • LITTLE BY LITTLESubscription

    Archive11 January, 2007

    LEGAL

  • LIMITED APPEALSubscription

    Archive2 November, 2006

    LEGAL

  • ROOT CAUSESubscription

    Archive26 October, 2006

    LEGAL

  • LIGHT FANTASTICSubscription

    Archive19 October, 2006

    The vagaries of how buildings are used continue to pose occasional challenges to the venerable topic of rights of light, writes Sue Lindsey. Last year the court heard arguments about whether it was relevant that a modern office block was continuously artificially lit (Midtown v City of London Real Property Company; AJ 17.02.05).

  • FIRST PRINCIPLESSubscription

    Archive12 October, 2006

    LEGAL

  • GOING ON STRIKESubscription

    Archive21 September, 2006

    LEGAL

Show  10 per page20 per page50 per page