Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Yet another Rudolph building faces destruction

  • Comment
Another Paul Rudolph building could face the wrecking ball, with a tower in Boston, USA, set to make way for an 80-storey tower designed by Renzo Piano.

The move has pitted preservationists against the developer, Steve Belkin, who has firm backing for the demolition from Boston's Mayor Thomas Menino.

The 13-storey Rudolph tower, designed in the mid-1960s, is yet another building by the Modernist facing destruction, with some of his work already having been razed.

Rudolph's Micheels Residence in Connecticut has already been demolished (Rudolph home demolished despite massive opposition), and his Riverview High School in Florida is also in danger (AJ 18.01.07).

Preservation body Docomomo, which is devoted to preserving Modernist buildings, has stated that although it is not opposed to the new development, it does believe a solution is possible that accommodates Rudolph's building.

The squat tower, with its intricate concrete exterior, was said to be well ahead of its time, and president of Docomomo's New England branch, David Fixler, told the New York Times that Rudolph's building could still accompany Piano's.

Fixler said: 'There is a spirit of structural and system experimentation associated with the Rudolph building that is very close to Renzo Piano's. If it could be saved, it would make a good neighbour to his tower.'

by Richard Vaughan

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.