By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.

Close

Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

Panel chair weighs in over AA validation row

The man at the heart of the furore over the Architectural Association’s (AA’s) Part 2 validation has challenged claims that the decision to bestow ‘continued’ status on the school was made by ‘majority’ (AJ online 13.03.08).

Robert Hutson chaired the eight-strong validation panel which recommended that the AA receive ‘conditional’ endorsement, asking that AA students be made more aware of Part 2 criteria.

But writing in the AJ, RIBA head of education David Gloster claims that following the RIBA’s validation procedure, the ‘original board members… decided by a majority to amend their own findings’ to give the school ‘conditional’ status.

But, speaking exclusively to the AJ, Hutson, who heads up Essex-based Robert Hutson Architects, said: ‘David Gloster is wrong to say there was a majority in favour of changing the report.

‘We were only given a week to deliberate, during which two of the panel were not available. Of the remaining six, two were for it, two against and one ambivalent. I took the role of chair and recommended that we grant the school “continued” status.

‘When I learned that the two who didn’t vote were against, I thought, hang on – the consensus is clearly against,’ added Hutson.

Referring to the protracted delay in publishing the panel’s final report, Hutson added: ‘The real crime is that the board was given just one week to deliberate when Gloster has had a year.’

In another twist, AJ columnist Patrick Lynch has turned down an interview to join the validation pool. After reading the AJ’s story, Lynch wrote to the RIBA’s Jannine Newman: ‘I am afraid that I cannot see any point in even contemplating becoming a member of the RIBA validation panel at present… It is a disgrace that a visiting board be treated in this manner.’

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters