Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

KPF withdraws second Smithfield proposal, leaving it with one last chance

  • Comment
The saga surrounding Kohn Pedersen Fox's (KPF) controversial plans for Smithfield Market in central London have taken yet another twist.

Thornfield Properties, the developer behind the £200 million scheme, which would see the demolition of a number of historic market buildings, has withdrawn its second of three applications for the site.

The move leaves the developer with just one surviving proposal on the table - a seven-storey development which was given a 'fast-track' rubberstamping by the City of London last month to the consternation of heritage groups (City Planners face wrath of heritage groups for 'fast-tracking' KPF's Smithfield scheme).

Although lower than earlier proposals, it is understood the remaining scheme will cover a larger area around the famous meat market.

According to a spokesman for Thornfield, the decision will mean the design and development team can concentrate on the one outstanding application - due to be heard before a public inquiry, possibly as early as August.

He said: 'This scheme is a more comprehensive approach - we want to focus our resources on that proposal, which also deals with the adjacent plot.'

However, SAVE Britain's Heritage, which has fought a protracted battle with the developers since the first plans were unveiled for the site in early 2004, feels this third version of the scheme is being rushed through.

A spokesman for the group said: 'SAVE believes that the inquiry should be postponed to allow us to properly grapple with all the issues surrounding this larger application, from the demolition of the general market to the frankly weird 1980s style facade-job proposed for the Red House and annex.'

He added: 'Even better though, they should withdraw this application and give up on trying to pull down these perfectly reusable and handsome historic market buildings.'

by Richard Waite

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.