By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Eco-towns are in the wrong places, report claims

The government’s proposed eco-towns are in the wrong locations, and the whole initiative should be renamed if it is to be successful, says a report released this week.

Eco Towns and Beyond, a paper written by housing specialist PRP Architects, urban designer Urbed and lobby group Design for Homes, says the government should reconsider its decision to site eco-towns in rural locations only and concentrate on urban extensions with existing planning permissions.

Andy von Bradsky, chairman of PRP, said: ‘There are a lot of places, which have got a consent, where housebuilders can’t move forward because of their own market issues. Ought we not to be looking to those places, instead of new ones? That seems to be a more logical position in the context of a changed economy.’

The report, which takes lessons from European eco-developments such as Hammarby Sjöstad in Stockholm, recommends placing eco-towns on brownfield sites with existing planning permissions.

‘The cost of getting infrastructure into [eco-towns], and the carbon emissions in terms of transport to and from them, raise a whole series of questions around the locations,’ said von Bradsky. ‘If you have an urban extension you don’t have to pay for new everything.’

The eco-towns effort has been beset by the crashing residential market, local opposition in areas in which they are proposed and unfavourable comparisons with post-war New Towns.

Von Bradsky also questioned the name of the initiative. ‘The term eco-towns is an unfortunate one, because you should be applying the same principles to any large-scale development,’ he said.

Report co-author and Urbed director Nicholas Falk said: ‘Successful European eco-towns are closely linked to thriving urban conurbations, where there is a demand for housing. None of the projects we looked at are standalone settlements.’

Consultant Pricewaterhouse-Coopers is also carrying out research into the procurement and funding models of eco-developments outside the UK in order to look at more commercially viable alternatives to the British model. Its final conclusions will be released in September.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters