Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Document reveals jury's concerns with Zaha's Aquatics Centre

  • Comment
Potential problems with the roof of Zaha Hadid’s Aquatics Centre for the London 2012 Olympic Games were spotted by the original competition jury back in 2004.
In a revealing document released by contest organiser the London Development Agency, the judges admitted there had been ‘clear technical and organisational issues’ and a ‘maintenance concern over the timber ceiling in [the] aggressive pool hall environment’.

Hadid’s winning design has subsequently been scaled back and costs have risen from an initial figure of £73 million to closer to £300 million.

Intriguingly the judges’ report – made public following a Freedom of Information bid by the Guardian – also offers interesting insights into why the other shortlisted entries were rejected by the jury which was co-chaired by Richard Rogers.

These include Massimiliano Fuksas’ ‘very sexy’ but unworkable ‘piece of sculpture; Dominique Perrault’s ‘thought provoking but out of scale piece of city’; Bennetts Associates’ unimpressive but functional entry; Behnisch, Behnish + Partners’ scheme, ranked a ‘distant third’; and FaulknerBrowns:make’s technically astute but ‘confused in legacy’ mode proposals.

Click here to read the document in full.
  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.