Three young architects win urban design scholarships

  • Published: 16 July 2008 18:11
  • Last Updated: 04 August 2008 18:02
  • Reader Responses  

Three young practitioners have been selected as the winners of the AJ/RPS Urban Design Scholarships. These scholarships, initiated by the AJ, aim to raise the level of expertise in the key field of urban design among architectural practitioners.

 

Joe Morris of Duggan Morris Architects, Fiona Scott of Gort Scott Architects, and Alicia Pivaro beat a field of nearly 100 applicants to win the opportunity to work with a mentor from Design for London, the Greater London Authority's urban design and architecture adviser, on a project of their choice for up to six months.See interviews with the winners and photos from the awards evening.


AJ/RPS Urban Design Scholarships with Design for London from Ruth Slavid on Vimeo.

The awards were preceded by a symposium at the RIBA, chaired by AJ editor Kieran Long. Speakers tackling the question 'what is urban design?' were Mark Brearley, of Design for London, Colin Bloch from RPS, Jeremy Grint from the London Borough of Barking and Robert Mull from London Metropolitan University.

The AJ will follow the progress of the three winners over the next six months, both in the magazine and online.

Please note: In order to post a response you need to be registered on the site. You can register here.

Reader Response

Yes, I agree with the earlier post, seems there is nothing new in the offing here...simply taking urban design to be big architecture. Having watched the video I think the only proposal that is relevant is the one looking at suburban collective space.

I must declare an interest here, having entered the competition myself. Since then I have been curious to see what ground breaking research initiatives would be being fostered through this initiative. Thoroughly disappointing at this stage, but perhaps the judges' comments can help illuminate what these three projects will contibute to the body of knowledge.

Could we ask for the judges illuminations as well?
By the samples brought here it sounds like this is all about the same old chewed up slogans by new faces. Was the original thinking cut by the editors?
Best wishes to the winners.