Zaha's Oxford college extension branded 'awkward'

Zaha Hadid's proposed extension to the Middle East Centre at St Antony's College in Oxford has been branded 'awkward' and 'in constant competition with its neighbours' by CABE.

The commission's design review panel said the extension – a curvaceous Corian-clad link between two Victorian buildings – needed to be more 'sophisticated and delicate to relate' to the surrounding North Oxford conservation area.

Dubbed the Softbridge, the three-storey scheme is intended to house a reading room, library, storage space and a lecture hall.

However, the proposed internal layout of the project also came in for criticism from the design watchdog.
 
The report reads: 'It appears unfortunate to position the archive and reading room behind the large south facing window; we wonder whether full sunlight and overheating could potentially compromise the usability of this space.'
 
CABE concludes that the scheme – which it admits is on a difficult site, and succeeds in 'evoking a dramatic landscape' – should be reconsidered before detailed plans are submitted.
 
The commission adds: 'We do not think a balance between the new Middle East Centre, the context and the adjacent buildings has yet been reached.
 
'While we support the concept in principle, in order for the building to live up to its potential and meet the aspiration of the local authority, the college and the donor, the issues stated above need to be addressed before the planning permission is given.'
 
Neither the college nor the architect was available for comment.


Zaha_Oxford

Zaha_Oxford2

Zaha_Oxford3

Please note: In order to post a response you need to be registered on the site. You can register here.

Reader Response

good call oxford,

thank god someone is thinking clearly.
this project is architectural hubris at its worst,
a formal solution that has the gravitas of a gesticulation and more relevance to the graphic design field than to the practice of architecture. what is remarkable about this project is more what has not been considered,

award a better architect than this one the chance to build in the wonderful location, please.

good call oxford,

thank god someone is thinking clearly.
this project is architectural hubris at its worst,
a formal solution that has the gravitas of a gesticulation and more relevance to the graphic design field than to the practice of architecture. what is remarkable about this project is more what has not been considered,

award a better architect than this one the chance to build in the wonderful location, please.

Flashy, self indulgent forms again

Personally I think its complimenting the buildings around it. I can hardly call that brutalist and quiet ugly concrete edifice next door a masterpiece so what's wrong with placing a beautiful building in this setting to enhance this area? As long as it is executed to high standard which i'm sure it will be I have no issue.

My view is based of course on the limited pictures shown. On the positive, I love the form and the anticipated spaces I can see inside. I think there will be wonderful spaces created. However, I have to agree, contextually it doesn't work. It looks to be a very sculptural building, but it seems to be just "plonked" into place without any regard for the surrounds. Many contemporary styles can work with older styles. In this case, I can't see that marriage. But this is based on what I perceive from the pictures provided. It could work from other viewing points. Unfortunately not from those provided.

My view is based of course on the limited pictures shown. On the positive, I love the form and the anticipated spaces I can see inside. I think there will be wonderful spaces created. However, I have to agree, contextually it doesn't work. It looks to be a very sculptural building, but it seems to be just "plonked" into place without any regard for the surrounds. Many contemporary styles can work with older styles. In this case, I can't see that marriage. But this is based on what I perceive from the pictures provided. It could work from other viewing points. Unfortunately not from those provided.

I think in the context of this being an overt statement of an intervention by Zaha Hadid, it is extremely contextual. Mind you, I always find she's successful in that regard.

Why is 'an approporiate contextual response' so frequently seen as a predictable adoption of the proportions and materials of a bygone age?

Within these constraints Zaha would need to find a site within a futuristic space colony to justify her beautiful form-making.

Lets get into the 21st century and catch up with the sculptural progress within the (non-planner constrained) automotive / aero space and product design world.

nice concept...but it does look awkward with the existing buildings. Its the location which is'nt right. The building itself does look great, but its just not inkeeping with the surrounding buildings and just does'nt sit right for me.....

Not sure I agree. It may be a beautiful form in its own right (very zeitgeisty), but does it have anything to do with the context ? I fear we will look back at such interventions in the future and truly see them as the carbuncles so many of them are.