Hemingway attacks 'unsustainable' Leeds

Design guru Wayne Hemingway branded Leeds 'the most unsustainable city' and full of buildings that 'were totally indistinguishable from each other' at a high-level conference yesterday (31 January).

The Red or Dead founder launched a broadside at the quality of the architecture and the public realm in the West Yorkshire hub during the council-led Leeds City Centre Vision conference.

Hemingway, who spoke alongside the likes of Terry Farrell and civic architect John Thorpe, also called on the council to ban any developer whose schemes did not meet the Building for Life Gold standard from ever working in the city again.

He said: 'The buildings going up today [in Leeds] are totally indistinguishable from each other and will have to be pulled down in less than 50 years. Leeds has got to slow down and start building for posterity – it's about civic quality and creating buildings which will be still here in 300 years.

'If developments are seen as being just temporary… then in terms of energy use [Leeds] is the most unsustainable city.'

Attacking the city's disjointed public spaces, he added: 'Wherever you go in Leeds, you hit a full stop. You see other cities go through such development upheaval and manage to keep people flowing.'

He went on to say that Leeds did not offer 'cradle to grave' living, and that although 'loads and loads' of good words had been written about the future, the city was failing to deliver and could not live up to its branding 'Live It, Love It'.

During a question-and-answer session after Hemingway's salvo, he admitted that a similar outburst at the quality of the public realm in Salford had not been listened to. Asked how his comments as a design consultant had been received by the local council, he said 'Shit'.


 


Please note: In order to post a response you need to be registered on the site. You can register here.

Reader Response

It seems as usual, some self proclaimed expert comes along and has a snipe at one of the northern cities that is trying it's hardest to recover from decades of neglect, and as usual there is no substance or specific detail whatsoever to most of the broad-brush hollow criticisms raised. Leeds is a fine city and has been upheld previously as a good example of urban regeneration due to careful planning considerations. Perhaps if Mr Hemmingway would refrain from laying the verbal boot in to a city still on its knees trying to get back up, he would receive a more sympathetic hearing.

I think you answered your own point about C18th London. There is a certain quality of material and consideration to space and light which ensured the roll-out of a successful template, and also ensured their longevity - an aspect of sustainability that is frequently overlooked and what it sounds like Hemmingway was talking about. Making iconic, odd shaped buildings out of polycarbonate with a life of 15 years does seem a bit voguish, and I'm guessing that might have been what Hemmingway was sniping at.

Hemingway is right, there's simply not a lot of design quality in Leeds and I grew up not far from there. You have to wonder whether the planners there are allowed to say "no". It's especially a shame when you see Manchester creating some great developments when arguably both cities have a similar pulling power...

That's funny. Eighteenth-century London is full of buildings that are totally indistinguishable from each other - but nobody complains.

What does Hemingway want - a city of attention-seeking gimmicky buildings, each as unlike its neighbours as possible?