By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Tories plan industry advisory group

HOK vice-president works with Party to deliver high-level built-environment advice to ministers

The Conservative Party could create the government’s first built-environment advisory group now that it has succeeded in its bid to form a coalition government, following last week’s general election which resulted in a hung parliament.

Sherin Aminossehe (pictured right), vice-president of the HOK Planning Group, is set to lead the body. She first proposed it last year, and approached shadow planning minister Bob Neill with the idea in March.

The advisory group would exist alongside the Construction Industry Council’s all-party group for built environment professionals, which was announced last month.

Aminossehe’s group would comprise architects and construction industry professionals, and would offer detailed advice to ministers and civil servants, functioning in a similar way to the government’s Treasury advisory groups.

The non-party-political panel’s 15 members would meet twice a month, with a broad remit to advise on design, architecture and planning policy.

 ‘If you think how much money comes into the UK economy from construction, it’s something we need to think more professionally about,’ said Aminossehe. ‘The idea is for ministers to have really high-level professional advice.’

Brian Waters, president of the Association of Consultant Architects, said: ‘It sounds like a very good idea to have a non-political sounding board for the strategic-level politicians for dealing with the built environment.

‘It’s better than a personality guru or a tsar – a group has less chance of “falling out”,’ he added. However, Waters stressed that he does support the government’s chief construction ‘tsar’ Paul Morrell.

Architects should be ‘well-represented’ in Aminossehe’s group, according to Waters, because they would help ministers and civil servants better understand high-quality design – a field that Waters says has ‘a very considerable area of subjectivity’.

But Robert Adam of Adam Architecture disagrees. ‘Architects have no special place here,’ said Adam, ‘and, as they largely operate according to avant-garde ideals, they represent an in-principle anti-democratic aesthetic which should be treated with circumspection by politicians.’

Readers' comments (1)

  • I disagree with Robert Adam, of course Architects have a role here. They are pivotal in aiding this group to succeed, otherwise we would end up with a world of architecture like that produced by Adam Architecture!!

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters