By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Tories call for OJEU overhaul

RIBA to look at ‘over-interpretation’ of European procurement rules

The Conservative party is drawing up plans to overhaul the OJEU procurement process in
a bid to make it more open.

Incoming RIBA president Ruth Reed told the AJ the institute was drafting a paper for the Conservative’s Policy Review, and was also consulting with the European Union for clarification on the current system.
In particular, Reed has been asked to investigate how the British interpretation of the European procurement law could be made less ‘excessive and restrictive’. She said: ‘We have an opportunity to look at the whole business of the pre-qualification questionnaire and how this country may be constraining itself by over-interpreting EU laws. Clear guidance from government to clients will be central to our requests, as will regional engagement with client bodies.’

Architects are welcoming the possibility of a simplification of OJEU procurement, which many agree can be expensive, time-consuming and make it impossible for smaller practices to bid.
Foster Lomas director Will Foster said: ‘To win with OJEU you have to prove you have the experience and that you can deliver, but if you’re a young company you can’t do that.’

Others believe the authorities are to blame, not the system. Gordon Tero at Stride Treglown said: ‘For some procurement managers, OJEU means the path of least resistance. They will pick one multi-disciplinary team so they only have one paper to sign.’

Currently, there are 11 jobs advertised on OJEU relating directly to architectural services, with a total value of £47.5 million. A further 16 jobs require architects as part of a multi-disciplinary team.

Smaller firms say they favour open competitions. Director of Studio Three Architects, Mushtaq Saleri, agreed: ‘Smaller practices are qualified to do the work, but it’s judged by people who don’t understand.’

Readers' comments (4)

  • the sooner we leave Europe the better.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Could there not be a pre-qualification points system which once on meant you were already qualified to apply for certain jobs. This could be based on practice size, experience etc. For each job there would be a minimum x number points to bid for it. As your practice gained more experience you could get more points to enable you to bid for a wider range of jobs. You could also combine with other practices to get more points. This would save having to complete endless forms time and again to apply for jobs. We find in Ireland that no two tender applications for these sort of jobs are the same so you are re-inventing the wheel everytime.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • The Glover Review, which was commissioned by this Government last year, calls for a number of changes to make the OJEU system more open, including a standardised PQQ.

    The review's recommendations are supposed to be coming into force next year.

    http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/glover_review_index.htm

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • About time; but will it be enough to actually help small practices. I doubt it.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters