By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Spending review: £2 billion capital boost saves flagship projects

The government today (20 October) unveiled plans to boost capital spending, safeguarding a raft of cultural and infrastructure projects

As part of the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR), the chancellor of the exchequer George Osborne announced capital spending would be £2 billion a year higher than set out in the emergency budget in June when the government axed £11 billion worth of capital projects.

Total capital spending, he said, would be: ‘£51 billion next year, then £49 billion, then £46 billion, and £47 billion in 2014-15.’

Projects saved include: Herzog and De Meuron’s Tate Gallery extension and Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners’ British Museum extension project.

Foreign Office Architects’ redevelopment of Birmingham New Street Station has also been safeguarded, and so too has Crossrail and the PLP and HOK-designed UKCMRI project in Camden, north London.

Osborne explained: ‘When money is short we should ruthlessly prioritise those areas of public spending which are most likely to support economic growth, including investments in our transport and green energy infrastructure, our science base and the skills and education of citizens.’

A new bridge over the Mersey at Runcorn will also be built and funding will be made to available to the St Helier, Royal Oldham and West Cumberland new hospitals schemes.

Further detail on projects receiving funding is expected to be announced shortly.

Readers' comments (2)

  • So, at a time when "We are all in this together" a couple of eye wateringly expense vanity projects that will mainly benefit foreign tourists in London escape the axe? Also - does the UKCMRI really have to be in the capital?

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • The sacrifice of cabe to pay for these second rate schemes is an abomination. New Street YES but Tate and British Museum extensions NO Both projects are entirely out of keeping with an 'age of austerity'

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters