Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Ruling leaves older architects at risk of forced retirement

  • 1 Comment

A High Court decision that may leave thousands of elderly architects vulnerable to losing their jobs has been met with anger

The ruling, which came under the Heyday test case brought by charity Age UK (formerly Age Concern), means that employers are now able to force employees aged over 64 to retire. The decision could potentially affect up to 3,974 ARB-registered architects, or 12 per cent of the profession.

Former RIBA president Owen Luder, 81, believes the case could be used to release ageing staff without redundancy pay. He said: ‘Employees who are 65 or over in an office that is looking to shed staff… will feel uncomfortable.

‘Many practices operate these days as limited companies [and this ruling] may be seen as an opportunity to get rid of a director who is considered redundant.’

However, the decision is unlikely to have a long-term impact as the government is set to bring forward its review of the default retirement age to next year.

The head of employment law at solicitors’ firm Mace & Jones, Martin Edwards, commented that although it will remain a complex area, the expected outcome of the review should help those who wish to continue working past 65.

He said: ‘Some of the comments in this judgement may make it difficult for the government not to increase the retirement age to at least 68, but it is possible that we will see the ability to compulsorily retire abolished altogether in the near future.’

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Another example of a stealthy way to undermine the profession if you ask me. It's well recognized that the best work by many is produced later in life, let the money orientated types reduce the chance of this and quality will drop further.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.