By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.

Close

Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Close

Revealed: the six finalists in George Square contest

The AJ can reveal the designs by the six teams shortlisted in the competition to overhaul Glasgow’s George Square

High Line-mastermind and post-Games Olympic Park designers James Corner Field Operations with Gillespies and Make Architects is vying for the £15 million project against landscape specialists Gustafson Porter; France’s Agence Ter with Hengehan Peng and Atmos; jmarchitects with Graeme Massie Architects; John McAslan & Partners; and Burns + Nice, the public realm design team behind the recent revamp of London’s Leicester Square.

Despite council plans to remove 12 statues and monuments from the square which led to objections from experts and the public some of the submitted schemes have retained and repositioned them.

The judging panel includes David Mackay, partner at MBM Architects Barcelona, Andy McMillan, former head of Mackintosh School of Architecture.The panel’s technical advisor is Neil Baxter, secretary and treasurer, RIAS

All the designs by will go on anonymous display at The Lighthouse in Glasgow next week. A winner is expected to be announced on 18 January 2013.

Gordon Matheson, leader of Glasgow City Council, said: ‘The calibre of the six designs is very high and I’m sure whichever design team is chosen, Glaswegians will have a George Square to be proud of again.

‘It is absolutely essential we choose the right team to create a new George Square – a George Square fit for the 21st Century. I look forward to working closely with the winning design team to develop their design and give the people and businesses of Glasgow the George Square they deserve.’

The redevelopment of the square will be carried out in two phases and Glasgow City Council hope the first stage will be complete before the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games.

Comment: Alan Dunlop of Glasgow-based Alan Dunlop Architects

Glasgow’s history is defined by three distinctive ages; the Medieval, the Georgian and the Victorian. Although little remains of the medieval city, the Victorian city still flourishes and much of the Georgian grid remains intact.

The square was named after George III and was set out in 1781, on the periphery of Georgian Glasgow. Since then, it has grown in status; from a field where horses were slaughtered for Glasgow’s tanning industry to the most important civic space in the city and a front to the City Chambers.  

At the centre of the square, on top of an 80ft Doric column stands Sir Walter Scott, Scotland’s most revered writer from her Age of Enlightenment. Glasgow has always been socially and politically radical and George Square has been at the centre of it all. The original statue of George III was torn down after the American War of Independence and in 1919; Churchill sent troops and tanks into the square to quell the Red Clydesiders.

Currently, the square is peppered with bronzes of important Georgians and Victorians, including Robert Burns and James Watt and although the majority of Glaswegians could not tell you who the rest were, or their significance, since the announcement of the competition for the redevelopment of the square their potential removal has become a highly contentious issue.

It is within this brief context that the competition for the £15 million redevelopment of the square will be judged. Of the 39 expressions of interest, six international teams were invited to create a ‘world class’ new square.

With just two whacky exceptions that incorporate, what looks like a stone umbrella canopy and a glass ramp that corals the bronzes, the submissions and images are restrained with an emphasis on the quality of surface material and hard landscaping befitting such an important space. It’s clear also that some of the competitors have listened or read many of the comments from those Glaswegians who longed for better seating, trees and greenery.

The majority of bronzes seem also to have been kept although some have been relocated to make the central space bigger and better able to hold larger gatherings, remembering the importance of the square in the social and political history of the city. Although submissions are secret, you can judge those entrants who perhaps know little about the city. They have placed their canopies and covered spaces on the south side of the square, where they will get little sunlight, if any and be in shadow. The north side is where these structures should be.

The bolder proposals include water features of some size where children and adults seem to be frolicking. One thinks of the Crown Fountain in Chicago and although undoubtedly attractive some may question its suitability in the west of Scotland. The presentations are slick with perhaps too much emphasis on cgi, on first view they seem nonetheless to be well considered and respectful of the square’s significance to the civic and public life of the city and should encourage much debate. I hope so.

 

 

Readers' comments (4)

  • Water features? Always *such* a good idea.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Water features aside, Entry 2 seems to better understand the social, political and civic context of the square. That in my view is fundemental and suggest an architect that is very familiar with Glasgow and its history........it is also a fine proposal and that also seems to be reflected in the poll above.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • Kevan Shaw

    Really exciting to see these competition entries. Is there any way to view the images any larger? It is very difficult to make out what the teams are actually proposing. I am sure most readers would enjoy a good close look at these visuals. A description of each concept would be great too.
    Loving the umbrellas throughout!

    Unsuitable or offensive?

  • http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=3411

    you can see the proposals here and download higher resolution images

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Files

Poll

Which scheme do you want to win?

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters