By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Prince Charles slams Rogers' Chelsea Barracks plans

Prince Charles has lambasted Richard Rogers’ design for the redevelopment of London’s Chelsea Barracks, labelling it ’unsuitable’ and ‘unsympathetic’


According to the Daily Mail, Prince Charles has made a personal plea to the site’s owner, Qatari Diar (the development arm of the Qatari royal family), asking it to consider an alternative design for the central London project. It is understood that the Prince of Wales is backing a more classical design by architect Quinlan Terry.

The site was purchased by Qatari Diar and Christian Candy’s development business, Guernsey based CPC Group from the Ministry of Defence for almost £1 billion in 2006. The original plans by Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners included 640 flats in a series of pavilions of up to 10 storeys high, adjacent to the site’s original 1691 Christopher Wren-designed building.

However, following objections by the Belgravia Residents Association, the design was amended to reduce the number of flats and increase the amount of open space. Even so, the modernist steel-and-glass design remains, which residents claim is not in keeping with the area.

It is not the first time the project has come under fire. In June 2008, the AJ reported that the Duke of Westminster – who owns the Grosvenor Estate adjacent to the west London site – had attacked the proposals for being ‘monotonous’ and ‘out of context’.

Readers' comments (1)

  • I hate the excuse 'not in keeping with the area'. When the 1691 building was built it was clearly not in keeping with the area, so why should Rogers do the same. A design that appreciates context needn't be one that copies it.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related images

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters