Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Planners attack government's further planning reform plans

  • Comment

A senior planner officer has warned government plans for more planning reform could decrease the number of new homes built

The criticism comes one day after the government revealed fresh plans to boost development by shortening planning inquiries and judicial reviews and softening planning laws for greenbelts

Malcolm Sharp, Planning Officers’ Society president, told The Daily Telegraph it was lack of finances and not bureaucracy holding back development.

He said: ‘Developers have hundreds of thousands of plots where they have planning permission granted but they are not building.

‘Instead of talking about planning, we need to find other ways to help developers use those sites.’

Yesterday, the government launched a fresh assault on planning just months after the controversial National Planning Policy Framework came into effect.

The new measures to support enterprise included a state backed small business bank and £10 billion worth of house building guarantees for housing associations and private sector developers.

Chancellor George Osborne indicated the government would also encourage councils to allow development on greenbelt land if fresh greenbelt land was designated elsewhere.

Landscape Institute president Sue Illman questioned whether it was sustainable to build on greenbelt land or logical because of the need to build new infrastructure.

She said: ‘The Green Belt is one of the most successful planning initiatives of the past half century.  Digging it up is lazy policy-making.  We have just witnessed how a significant Brownfield site could be rapidly and fundamentally developed to deliver an Olympic Park and Athletes’ Village that will act as a catalyst for wider development and private investment.’ 

She added: ‘It is not sustainable to develop on Green Belt land; nor is it sustainable to allow suburban estates to sprawl out into the countryside.  And, it is illogical to build costly new infrastructure on green belt land when building on existing Brownfield land allows for incremental growth using existing infrastructure.’

 

Subscribe to AJ for £3 per week

Subscribe today and receive 47 issues of the magazine, 12 issues of AJ Specification and full access to TheAJ.co.uk and the AJ Buildings Library

Are you a student?

Students can subscribe to the AJ for £8 per month or £1.60 per week! Click here to start receiving the most recommended magazine for architecture students

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.