By continuing to use the site you agree to our Privacy & Cookies policy

Your browser seems to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser.


Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.


Osborne wants planning incentives

Chancellor George Osborne has said more should be done to allow local communities to benefit financially for accepting the approval of nearby planning projects

He said the current system, whereby developers offer services or amenities if their applications were approved, was inadequate.

And he said the Government will put in place a system where economic benefits of major construction and development deals were passed on to the local taxpayer.

Osborne said as it stands, there is ‘no incentive for a local community to accede to a planning request’.

He added: ‘They see none of the economic gain that comes from planning decisions.

‘I see this all the time as a constituency MP, families and communities get together and petition against planning decisions because there is absolutely nothing in it for them.’

The Chancellor said the Government wanted to ‘tilt the balance’ so that communities stood to benefit directly from major projects which they might otherwise oppose.

‘We want to change the incentives in planning so there are direct economic benefits for local communities,’ he said, suggesting that that could be done through council tax or business rates.

He added: ‘I think that will then tilt the balance so there is a positive incentive to go ahead with development.’

Readers' comments (1)

  • We are designing affordable housing to be funded by the HCA - the local council is asking for a contribution towards local education needs and asking for us to reduce the 100% affordable scheme to include 15% POS. Highways are trying to persuade our client to build non-adoptable roads so they do not have to pay for their maintenance!

    The POS and private highways are to be maintained through a private service charge to the tenants of the new affordable housing development!? Its wrong!

    Are these stealth taxes truly considerate of the wider local community? And in the affordable housing sector, the more money clawed back in stealth tax makes it difficult to deliver quality housing developments that will last the test of time.

    I hope the new government will realise that this needs some careful thought.

    Unsuitable or offensive?

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment.

Related Jobs

Sign in to see the latest jobs relevant to you!

The searchable digital buildings archive with drawings from more than 1,500 projects

AJ newsletters